Florida SOS
What's Wrong in Florida?
[Home][What's Wrong in FL?]
|
![]() |
Since 1991, the Jacksonville District of the Corps has issued about 26,000
permits for activities in "waters of the United States." It has denied less than
50 permit applications.
On paper, the Clean Water Act provides a remarkable degree of protection to
wetlands and other "waters of the United States." The Environmental Protection
Agency adopted regulations to implement to Clean Water Act. They can be reviewed
at the EPA's terrific wetlands website:
These regulations attest to the fundamental importance of wetland protection and
the legal presumption in favor of protecting wetlands:
§ 230.1(b) Fundamental to these Guidelines is the precept that dredged or fill material should not be discharged into the aquatic ecosystem, unless it can be demonstrated that such a discharge will not have an unacceptable adverse impact either individually or in combination with known and/or probable impacts of other activities affecting the ecosystems of concern. (c) From a national perspective, the degradation or destruction of special aquatic sites, such as filling operations in wetlands, is considered to be among the most severe environmental impacts covered by these Guidelines. The guiding principle should be that degradation or destruction of special sites may represent an irreversible loss of valuable aquatic resources.
What happened when this strong law intersected with the "growth for growth's
sake" culture permeating Florida? Look around-you haven't seen any genuine
development constraints in wetlands imposed by the Corps in the past 30 years,
since the adoption of the Clean Water Act. It's pretty much been business as
usual.
Think about it: everything west of I-95 in Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach counties is historic Everglades. And think of all the post-1972 filling of the Everglades in those counties that has occurred. Indeed, the Corps has permitted the destruction of the Everglades, and yet the Corps is now in charge of Everglades restoration!! Go figure.
The sad truth is that the Clean Water Act, on the books for 30 years, hasn't
done much in Florida to protect the "waters of the United States." This can be
attributed to:
Go the EPA's Wetlands' Site
Go to the Jacksonville Division of the Corps (Florida Corps)
Just imagine if the Clean Water Act had been vigorously enforced over the
past 30 years. Florida would look much different, much better. Our water supply
would not be in crisis. Our wildlife would have a place to live. The Everglades
wouldn't be on the verge of decimation.
When Congress passed the Clean Water Act amendments in 1972, it built several
presumptions into the law. These include:
The Clean Water Act was never intended to be put on bureaucratic autopilot.
That's why Congress built a 30-day public comment period into the Act. The
comment period provides for citizens to review public notices and write to the
Corps about their concerns regarding a particular project.
Unfortunately, there has been no systematic, long-term citizen oversight of the
Corps' permitting. The Corps has only heard consistently from one interest
group: Developers!
Another important point: Commenting is the exercise of a public right granted
under the Clean Water Act. It should not subject a commenter to SLAPP (Strategic
lawsuit against public participation.)
The 30-day public comment period begins to run the day the public notice is put
out for public comment. If you need an extension of time in which to comment,
write to the Corps' project manager listed on the public notice and request your
extension. Explain why you need more time. The Corps' should give it to you if
your request is reasonable, but don't hold your breath: The Corps is not
friendly to the commenting public. FLASOS believes the Corps has been co-opted
by the development industry and views developers as its clients. The Corps
routinely caves to developers and will probably view you as a problem. So don't
expect much from the Corps in terms of hospitality.